фото показано с : bitcoinist.com

In case you’ve been away, there’s been a bit of a hoo-hah regarding Tether over the past week or so. This has now descended into open calls for Binance and other exchanges to delist ‘the original stablecoin’.

The story so far:

What this story really needed was few rabble-rousing villagers with pitchforks and torches, to rid the town of this ‘evil’. And there’s no better way of gathering those than posting a charged (and slightly leading) call to action on Reddit.

In light of Tether’s vast negligence, should the community call on exchanges to delist? from CryptoCurrency

There you go. Perfect. No need to detail Tether’s ‘vast negligence’; simply claiming it will convince most folk, especially with the current bad press. Seed of mob planted, just sit back while it gains momentum (and some high-profile support).

Coinbase CEO, Brian Armstrong, gave the campaign some early credibility, tweeting:

With the confirmation that Tether is not fully collateralized, my hope is that the industry graduates to more trustworthy stablecoins.

Swiss crypto-exchange, IQFinex, then bought into the argument wholesale, announcing the delisting of Tether as of 3rd May.

Following Binance’s delisting of Bitcoin SV, many were questioning why CZ didn’t step in and act as ‘judge, jury and executioner’ against Tether.

Now, whatever you may think of Tether (or CZ for that matter), let’s examine that last idea. In general, someone with the power of ‘judge, jury, and executioner’, is considered to be a bad thing. A very bad thing indeed if you care about justice in any way, shape or form. Is this really something that we want in the crypto-industry?

Let’s all just take a step back and look at things rationally.

Detractors have been going after Tether since it was announced. It is unsurprising that a vocal minority is using the current uncertainty as an attempt to stick the knife in.

In actual fact, many of Tether’s early problems, and Bitfinex’s $850 million ‘seizure’, were pretty much down to the same thing. Namely, the traditional banking world’s unwillingness to deal with cryptocurrency businesses.

This forces them to deal with lesser known, offshore, and sometimes highly dodgy entities. Authorities dismantled one such bank just this week; the same bank which held some of Bitfinex’s missing $850 million.

Rather than infighting amongst ourselves, the crypto-community should be fighting for the rights of all its members. A Tether which is short-term 26% backed by Bitfinex stock would still seem like a pretty solid coin.

Assuming that is, that the mob doesn’t take down Bitfinex too.

Should exchanges like Binance delist Tether? Share your thoughts below!

Images via Shutterstock

The post Mob Rule? The Call To Delist Tether Grows appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

471 +