Facebook’s Libra Cryptocurrency May not Launch in India

Facebook’s Libra Cryptocurrency May not Launch in India
ôîòî ïîêàçàíî ñ : btcmanager.com

2019-6-21 22:57

Facebook’s newly-unveiled cryptocurrency, Libra, will not be launched in India due to the country’s strict anti-crypto regulations, a person close to the matter told The Economic Times, June 20, 2019.

India Says “No” to Libra Touted as the crypto industry’s game-changer for months, Facebook finally released Libra’s whitepaper on June 18, 2019. However, it didn’tRead MoreRead More. The post by Aisshwarya Tiwari appeared first on BTCManager, Bitcoin, Blockchain & Cryptocurrency News\.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Libra Credit (LBA) íà Currencies.ru

$ 0.0004132 (+0.20%)
Îáúåì 24H $10.258k
Èçìåíåèÿ 24h: 1.11 %, 7d: -16.07 %
Cåãîäíÿ L: $0.0004132 - H: $0.0004132
Êàïèòàëèçàöèÿ $0 Rank 5131
Öåíà â ÷àñ íîâîñòè $ 0.0521721 (-99.21%)

libra india facebook cryptocurrency 2019 june didn

Èñòî÷íèê: btcmanager.com

libra india → Ðåçóëüòàòîâ: 12


Facebook’s Secret Cryptocurrency Led by PayPal Alumni Just ‘Months Away’ from India Launch

By CCN: Facebook’s much-hyped cryptocurrency project, dubbed Project Libra, may launch in India within a matter of months, according to a Bloomberg report. The secretive blockchain project, led by a team of PayPal alumni, is expected to launch a stablecoin for sending peer-to-peer payments to friends and family as well as integrating with major e-commerce players.

2019-5-9 12:49


Ïàðòíåðû Currencies.ru

Àíàëîã Notcoin - Blum - Èãðàé è çàðàáàòûâàé Ìîíåòû



Ðåêëàìà íà Currencies.ru

Ñàìîå ñâåæåå íà Currencies.ru

What's Next for FIT21? (A Consensus 2024 Recap)

CoinDesk held its annual Consensus conference in Austin, Texas last week, where we heard from lawmakers and regulators, developers, company execs and all sorts of other people in and around this sector.

How the SEC's Recent Win May Play in Its Coinbase, Binance Cases

A federal judge ruled that secondary-market transactions for certain cryptocurrencies violated securities law. The catch: This was a default judgment. The defendant never showed up, and no one filed amicus briefs to oppose the Securities and Exchange Commission's motion for a default ruling.