Ethereum Miners Vote to Make Themselves a bit Richer

2020-6-20 16:55

Ethereum miners are voting to increase the network’s gas limit from 10 million to 12.5 million per block. The move could lower transaction fees on the network, but it also has undue consequences.

Demand for Ethereum Blockspace

The decision to increase the gas limit is a positive implication for DeFi, which has recently suffered from bloated gas prices.

While DeFi activity and token prices are booming, users have been paying exorbitant fees for over two months now.

The #Ethereum miners are voting to increase the Block Gas Limit from 10,000,000 to 12,500,000. ⛏️

In theory, this means that the Ethereum network now has the capabilities to handle ~44 transactions per second, instead of ~35.

Another huge milestone for the community.🥳🎉

— Bitfly (@etherchain_org) June 19, 2020

Ethereum’s dApps are not at fault here because interacting with smart contracts requires several orders of magnitude more gas than, say, sending ETH from one address to another.

It costs over $8 to claim SNX on Synthetix, via Mintr

Every blockchain network has to balance the trade-offs between throughput and growing database size.

A blockchain that can process 15,000 transactions per second will be able to cater to a variety of users but makes life difficult for those running full nodes. This is because the size of the blockchain expands at a much faster rate.

The decision to increase Ethereum’s gas limit by 25% has its own set of repercussions. Péter Szilágyi, who leads the Go Ethereum team, doesn’t think this a good idea.

In a public tweet, Szilágyi said this move imperils the long term health of the network and increases the scope of DOS attacks.

Bitcoin maximalists often harp on the growing size of the Ethereum blockchain as a primary criticism. This is a fair argument because any public blockchain needs a variety of vigilant full node operators to ensure the network is functioning correctly.

Are Ethereum Miners Misaligned?

Miners unilaterally decide Ethereum’s the gas limit. An increase or decrease is subject to a hash-power weighted vote.

It is odd, however, that the users who benefit from a higher gas limit are in charge of setting that limit.

This decision should ideally be put in the hands of the community. People can discuss the pros and cons of such a move relative to prevailing circumstances.

But the Ethereum community has no say in the matter. Miners alone can change the gas limit, causing further burden to node operators.

Historically, Ethereum miners haven’t strayed too far from community consensus when it comes to the gas limit. Nevertheless, a solution that directs power away from miners, and towards users or node operators would result in more neutral outcomes.

The post Ethereum Miners Vote to Make Themselves a bit Richer appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Ethereum (ETH) на Currencies.ru

$ 3298.25 (-1.68%)
Объем 24H $25.638b
Изменеия 24h: -2.81 %, 7d: -15.34 %
Cегодня L: $3274.83 - H: $3393.89
Капитализация $397.291b Rank 2
Цена в час новости $ 227.68 (1348.63%)

ethereum miners network million make vote themselves

Источник: cryptobriefing.com

ethereum miners → Результатов: 126


Фото:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03


Фото:

Zcash Mining 400% More Profitable Than Bitcoin

Zcash (ZEC) is the most profitable cryptocurrency to mine, with expected returns far higher than other PoW coins like Ethereum (ETH) and Bitcoin (BTC). Data collected from cryptocurrency tools provider Anything Crypto suggests that at current difficulty levels, ZEC miners using the Antminer Z9 mini could expect an $8,000 return on their investment over a […] The post Zcash Mining 400% More Profitable Than Bitcoin appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

2018-7-13 18:28


дальше еще 77 новостей →

Партнеры Currencies.ru

Аналог Notcoin - Blum - Играй и зарабатывай Монеты



Реклама на Currencies.ru

Самое свежее на Currencies.ru

Jupiter opens vote on 215m unclaimed JUP tokens

Jupiter has opened voting on what happens to the 215 million JUP tokens unclaimed from the project’s airdrop. On Sept. 27, the Jupiter (JUP) team announced that the vote on how to dispose of unclaimed tokens is live. The tokens…

Defi protocol Gro votes to dissolve DAO and terminate operations

Gro DAO, a defi protocol, has voted to dissolve its decentralized autonomous organization and protocol in response to mounting challenges plaguing the platform. A snapshot of the proposal detailed the issues challenging the protocol. Over the past three years, contributors…