Bitcoin Is A New Paradigm Of Stakeholder Capitalism

Bitcoin Is A New Paradigm Of Stakeholder Capitalism
фото показано с : bitcoinmagazine.com

2022-7-2 06:00

If bitcoin becomes the world’s reserve currency, we can add scarcity and consequences back into the system to stop the cycle of moral hazard and malinvestment.

This is an opinion editorial by Mickey Koss, a West Point graduate with a degree in economics. He spent four years in the Infantry before transitioning to the Finance Corps.

History may not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme from time to time. As overextended cryptocurrency platforms like Celsius and Three Arrows Capital go insolvent, a benevolent billionaire steps in to rescue BlockFi and Voyager. But why? Because of the incentives; this is true, stakeholder capitalism at its best. The virtue of greed is playing out right before our eyes.

Knickerbocker Crisis: Banking Panic Of 1907

In 1907, the United States financial system was nearly brought to its knees through a series of defaults on stock market margin loans. Rampant speculation led to an over-leveraged system, ultimately resulting in a cascade of liquidations, the stock market crashing and the insolvency of the Knickerbocker Trust Company.

As contagion spread, individuals and banks alike began to withdraw deposits from the banks, lowering reserves at a time when banks were actually required to hold a portion of their deposits on hand.

Luckily, J.P. Morgan organized a private bailout of select banks by providing their own personal capital to shore up balance sheets and guarantee liquidity. Even though Knickerbocker was the third largest bank trust in New York City at the time, it was liquidated in a relatively orderly fashion and allowed to fail.

Though it may seem strange to think why these greedy capitalist fat cats would risk their own capital to save banks they didn’t own, it actually makes perfect sense if you think about it. If contagion was allowed to spread, it ran the risk of spreading to their own banks and companies. This was not altruism. This was pure and profitable self-interest: stakeholder capitalism. Save your competitors to save yourself because holding a stake in a failing system means that your stake risks failure as well. And guess what? It worked to an extent.

Lender Of Last Resort

The cryptocurrency space has no central bank and no lender of last resort. Without the ability to print his own money, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) is risking his own money to prevent the collapse of others. If BlockFi or Voyager goes down, SBF may be left with hundreds of millions of dollars in losses.

His reasoning undoubtedly must be similar to that of J.P. Morgan in 1907. Panic and contagion are not good for business. SBF is just following the incentives. By saving the businesses he assesses are viable in the long term, he is helping to stave off panic which could result in more pain and more loss for the industry. By allowing for the defunct business strategies to fail, he is mitigating the risk for further hazard in the future.

Save the system to save yourself. The private markets are incentivized to step in when no other alternative exists.

Bitcoin Fixes This

The fiat system is currently propped up by a central bank that promises to backstop banks with unlimited liquidity. The result is a system wrought with moral hazard. For the most part, banks don’t have to answer for their mistakes when they can be papered over with printed money.

The longer this is allowed to occur, the more deadwood piles up, increasing the risk of a truly apocalyptic financial forest fire.

By adopting bitcoin as a reserve currency, central banks can move back to a sound money standard. By removing the ability for unlimited liquidity creation, central banks will no longer be able to save the entire system from collapse. They can no longer prop up zombie companies and incentivize irresponsible risk-taking. Losses will no longer be able to be socialized while the banks privatize profits after their bailouts.

Scarcity is not only a key property of hard money, it is also a necessity for a sound and stable system of value. By adding scarcity and consequences back into the system, we can stop the cycle of moral hazard and malinvestment. We can clear out the deadwood and pave a path for a better future.

This is a guest post by Mickey Koss. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc. or Bitcoin Magazine.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Bitcoin (BTC) на Currencies.ru

$ 97495.33 (-0.47%)
Объем 24H $42.691b
Изменеия 24h: -1.05 %, 7d: 7.49 %
Cегодня L: $97495.33 - H: $98572.23
Капитализация $1929.044b Rank 1
Цена в час новости $ 19288.94 (405.45%)

bitcoin consequences system back hazard malinvestment moral

bitcoin consequences → Результатов: 92


Nepal Issues Warning; Shuts Access To Crypto Gambling And Other Apps

The Nepal Telecommunications Authority (NTA) stated that cryptocurrency activities or related activities shall be considered unlawful in Nepal. Nepal’s regulator of the technology sector issued this warning to the public that engaging in illegal activities, specifically related to cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, and gambling will have legal consequences.

2022-4-29 12:00


World Leaders Condemn Russia’s Attack On Ukraine – Bitcoin Takes Severe Beating

As the attack on Ukraine by Russia commenced as expected in the early hours Thursday, US and world leaders scurried to denounce Russia, warning of harsh consequences for its actions. Russian troops launched their predicted onslaught on Ukraine, ignoring international condemnation and sanctions and warning other countries that any effort at interference would result in […]

2022-2-24 10:17


Фото:

Fox News Host Tucker Carlson Lauds Bitcoin’s Impact As Canadian Truckers Protests Enter Day 10

“Bitcoin goes from person A to person B and all the intermediary does, the company, connects the two. It is pretty appealing and you can imagine the long-term consequences here. If the people in charge in this country and in Canada wanna make the US dollar irrelevant, they’ll keep acting like this and soon, then […]

2022-2-9 23:45


Top Credit Rating Agency, Fitch Ratings, Questions El Salvador’s Bitcoin Adoption

According to credit rating agency Fitch Ratings, El Salvador's adoption of Bitcoin as a legal tender may come to have unintended consequences. Bitcoin Adoption Could Lead To Negative Credit Rating President Nayib Bukele’s decision to grant benchmark cryptocurrency Bitcoin a legal tender status a few months ago came amid global applause from enthusiasts of the […] The post Top Credit Rating Agency, Fitch Ratings, Questions El Salvador’s Bitcoin Adoption first appeared on BitcoinExchangeGuide.

2021-8-17 17:05


Фото:

Billionaire Ray Dalio: U.S. Could Impose “Shocking” Tax Increases That’d Have Huge Consequences On Bitcoin

Billionaire hedge fund manager Ray Dalio is well known for his criticism of holding fiat money in the face of unprecedented money printing and runaway inflation. Now, Dalio asserts that bonds — or anything, really in dollars, is also not a safe investment play, especially with governments producing insane amounts of debt. In a recent […]

2021-3-16 20:03


Фото:

IOTA (MIOTA) Tangle Technology Uses Far Less Energy Than Bitcoin (BTC)

Digiconomist, a platform that claims to be dedicated to exposing the unintended consequences of digital trends from an economic angle, has evaluated the energy consumption of IOTA (MIOTA) and Bitcoin (BTC) and discovered that the latter uses over 10x more energy to carry a 1 BTC transaction as compared to IOTA’s Tangle, according to reportsRead MoreRead More.

2020-1-27 13:30


Blockstream CSO Shares the Consequences of Being Contentious Towards Bitcoin Legally

During the Litecoin Summit held on Tuesday, October 29, 2019, the Chief Strategy Officer of Blockstream, Samson Mow shared his viewpoint on regulatory restrictions on Bitcoin. To be more specific, he shared during the Liquid Network panel that such restrictions could be both good and bad for regulators, reports Coin Telegraph. Some of the big […]

2019-11-1 20:16


Фото:

FATF ‘Absurd’ Bitcoin Exchange Rules Will Reduce Crime, Researchers Admit

The FATF ‘Travel Rule’ that cryptocurrency proponents have described as “absurd” will result in a mass shift to compliance among Bitcoin exchanges, new data claims. FATF Rules Move Closer To Law In a report issued on September 9, Crystal Analytics, the dedicated offshoot of mining giant Bitfury, forecast possible consequences of cryptocurrency rules likely to become law across the globe by June 2020.

2019-9-10 16:00


G20 Policymakers to Discuss Regulations Proposed by Crypto Industry

As world leaders start arriving for the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan, policymakers and crypto industry representatives are convening at another summit to discuss the implications of proposed global standards for crypto assets and service providers, as well as solutions that will minimize unintended consequences of implementing these standards.

2019-6-27 14:05


Sidechains vs Plasma vs Sharding

Special thanks to Jinglan Wang for review and feedback One question that often comes up is: how exactly is sharding different from sidechains or Plasma? All three architectures seem to involve a hub-and-spoke architecture with a central “main chain” that serves as the consensus backbone of the system, and a set of “child” chains containing actual user-level transactions.

2019-6-14 04:03