As Ethereum Classic (ETC) Suffered a 51% Attack, Is Bitcoin Also Vulnerable?

2019-1-10 11:02

The recent 51% hack suffered by Ethereum classic known as the brother of ethereum the second rated Cryptocurrency on the 5th of January has thrown the crypto market into speculation of more 51% attack taking place.

The 51% attack on ethereum classic saw a single person able to control about 60% of the mining power which created a longer blockchain which enables them to double spend. This event led to the freezing of its trading of the 18th largest Cryptocurrency on top exchanges such as coinbase.

Opinions of Crypto Experts on the Hack

The hack has led to worries in the crypto space as some envisage the top value Cryptocurrency Bitcoin to be the next in line to experience a 51% attack.

One of the crypto experts that lend their thought on the event is the President of Blockchain at Columbia University, Nir Kabesa state that though it is difficult attacks on the larger Cryptocurrencies are no longer out of reach after the ETC 51% attack.

He noted that with the power securing ETC and the market cap of its supply being less than 1/20th of the ethereum main chain; the attack is not surprising. He further stated that it is now clear that it is much cheaper to 51% attack supposed top tier project than many might have assumed. The ETC value which supposed to he absolute immutable has been indicated to be not immutable because of the attack.

Also, the co-founder at Qtum and co-chair of the Smart Contracts Alliance Jordan Earls, lend his voice.  He stated that this latest attack could see an update on proof of work model. To him, the attack highlights the danger in the use of the PoW consensus in the system and extol the proof of stake implemented in Qtum which maintains the freedom and censorship resistance of proof of work, and it is without the risk of 51% attack. Though many have doubts about PoS, there has been no record of 51% attack.

Also, Senior Market Analyst at eToro, Mati Greenspan noted that the most common type of attack in crypto is the 51% attack. This happens when a foul player tries to control more than half of the network mining power, which leads to rewriting history.

Mati stated that if anyone is dreaming of 51% attack Bitcoin would be in need of about 4,500 times the amount of hashrate than what is needed to attack ETC.  In his opinion anyone thinking that the crypto market is in disarray is wrong.

However, the issue of Bitcoin 51% attack is still subjected to time.

The post As Ethereum Classic (ETC) Suffered a 51% Attack, Is Bitcoin Also Vulnerable? appeared first on ZyCrypto.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Ethereum (ETH) на Currencies.ru

$ 3309.97 (-0.35%)
Объем 24H $24.633b
Изменеия 24h: -0.83 %, 7d: -15.20 %
Cегодня L: $3274.83 - H: $3393.89
Капитализация $398.704b Rank 2
Цена в час новости $ 118.13 (2701.97%)

ethereum attack classic suffered vulnerable bitcoin etc

ethereum attack → Результатов: 92


Coinbase Forced to Suspend Ethereum Classic Trading After 51% Attack

Ethereum Classic, the original unforked Ethereum blockchain, has suffered a 51% attack resulting in nearly half a million dollars worth of double spends according to Coinbase. Coinbase detected the deep chain reorganizations over the weekend, forcing the cryptocurrency firm to freeze all Ethereum Classic transactions on their trading platforms and other products and services.

2019-1-8 23:00


Bitcoin Ransomware: The U.S. Indicts Iranians Over $6 Million Cryptocurrency Cyber-crimes

The U. S. Justice Department recently announced the indictment of two Iranians involved in a high-profile Bitcoin ransomware attack. Iranian Hackers Collect Bitcoin as Ransom According to a report by The Washington Post, the Justice Department of the United States on Wednesday (November 28) announced the indictment of two Iranian nationals involved in cryptocurrency ransomware attacks, […] The post Bitcoin Ransomware: The U.

2018-11-29 12:16


Фото:

A Bug Making Ethereum Transactions on Exchanges Vulnerable Has Been Fixed

A bug centering around a new Ethereum token, GasToken, which was enabling abuse on cryptocurrency exchanges, appears to have been resolved. The details are provided in a report originally published on November 13, 2018, that discussed how the bug was exploited by attackers, and what digital platforms could do if they wished to protect their hot wallet funds.

2018-11-22 00:34


$7.8M In Cryptocurrency Disappears From Trade.io “Cold Storage”, Hackers Implicated

Switzerland-based Trade. io Suffers Devastating Hack, Cold Wallet Affected In hand-to-hand fist fights, it is not like gentlemen to kick their opponents while they are already down. However, in the emerging cryptocurrency market, which has been bashed by violent sell-offs in the past nine months, malicious actors still seem poised to attack, hack, and steal from […] The post $7.

2018-10-23 03:28


It Costs $20 to Launch a 51 percent Attack on Einsteinium and Less than $200 to Force a Hard Fork in Feathercoin

There is this other side of crypto. It’s dark and full of dead coins. It keeps piling up every time ETH or BTC print lower. Though the market is expecting a rally with Ran Neur listing a couple of indicators to justify his bullish stand, Einsteinium coin creators and “community” should be having a hard […] The post It Costs $20 to Launch a 51 percent Attack on Einsteinium and Less than $200 to Force a Hard Fork in Feathercoin appeared first on Ethereum World News.

2018-10-9 14:59


Фото:

Etherscan rushes to plug vulnerabilities following strange hacking attempts overnight

Etherscan, the most widely used Ethereum blockchain explorer, has quickly patched security vulnerabilities overnight as hackers exploited certain parts of its service. Hackers successfully manipulated the Disqus API – a third-party service used by Etherscan that allows for comments to be left on Ethereum wallet addresses.

2018-7-24 13:00


Фото:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03