Uniswap Foundation Proposes Governance Reform To Redistribute Protocol Fees

2024-3-4 02:07

In a bid to enhance protocol governance, the Uniswap Foundation has unveiled a proposal aimed at redistributing protocol fees to holders of UNI tokens.

The proposal, which is now open for voting in snapshot form until March 7, seeks to introduce significant changes to Uniswap’s governance structure.

UF's proposal to upgrade Uniswap Protocol Governance has garnered a lot of support from both delegates and the broader community.

The next step is a Snapshot poll to gauge community sentiment. The poll will run for five days here: https://t.co/Nlg14bJuIy https://t.co/92G1CqjjpO

— Uniswap Foundation (@UniswapFND) March 1, 2024

The market’s response to the proposed reforms has been overwhelmingly positive, with the UNI token witnessing a substantial increase in price. Following the announcement of the proposal, the UNI token surged by over 10% to reach $13.39.

This uptick reflects investors’ growing confidence in Uniswap’s future trajectory and the potential benefits of the proposed governance changes.

The rise in Uniswap’s stock value mirrors the increasing trust exhibited by investors in the token’s long-term prospects.

The proposed redistribution of protocol fees has resonated positively with stakeholders, signaling a collective belief in the potential of Uniswap’s governance model to drive value creation and foster broader community participation.

More Insights On Whale Accumulation Of UNI

On-chain data from Lookonchain has shed light on the accumulation activities of prominent investors within the Uniswap ecosystem.

According to reports, two whales acquired a significant amount of UNI tokens, totaling 463,274 UNI tokens valued at $5.25 million, from Binance just yesterday. 

2 whales accumulated 463,274 $UNI($5.25M) from #Binance today.https://t.co/KZzZGG4u0Dhttps://t.co/rBNgjKquhd pic.twitter.com/KBJFPlYl02

— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) March 1, 2024

These accumulation activities underscore the growing interest and confidence among institutional and retail investors in Uniswap’s governance token.

The strategic acquisition of UNI tokens by whales further highlights the perceived value and potential upside of participating in Uniswap’s evolving governance framework.

As the voting process unfolds and stakeholders weigh in on the proposed governance reforms, the outcome of the decision-making process will likely shape the future direction of Uniswap’s protocol governance.

With the community actively engaged in shaping the platform’s governance model, Uniswap is poised to strengthen its position as a leading decentralized exchange and pioneer in the DeFi ecosystem.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Similar to Notcoin - TapSwap on Solana Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Uniswap (UNI) на Currencies.ru

$ 0 (+0.00%)
Объем 24H $0
Изменеия 24h: 0.00 %, 7d: 0.00 %
Cегодня L: $0 - H: $6.3433
Капитализация $0 Rank 99999
Доступно / Всего 0 UNI

protocol governance uniswap proposal fees foundation until

protocol governance → Результатов: 126


Would Coordinated Efforts of Governance Strengthen or Weaken Bitcoin?

Recent research suggests that there needs to be coordination between leading providers of cryptocurrency infrastructure products to protect against disruption caused by hard and soft forks. However, previous incidents of network upgrades have only strengthened bitcoin and efforts to govern the protocol raise questions over potential centralization.

2018-9-12 22:00


Фото:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03


Фото:

Promoted: The Future of Online Shopping Is Powered by Spl.yt — A Decentralized E-Commerce Protocol

As a rapidly growing business sector, e-commerce continues to open up new avenues for exploring, comparing and purchasing products worldwide. Spl. yt, a smart contract protocol, aims improve the e-commerce system for buyers and sellers by automating functions currently performed by “middlemen” marketplaces like Amazon, eBay and Alibaba.

2018-7-16 19:45