640 Crypto Projects Have Failed to Publish a Single Line of Code This Year

640 Crypto Projects Have Failed to Publish a Single Line of Code This Year
фото показано с : bitcoinist.com

2019-9-25 20:00

GitHub and development activity are one of the indicators for a healthy crypto startup project. Some repositories boast of high activity, especially around key launches.

Crypto Startups Lag in New Commits

But as much as 32% of all cryptocurrency projects failed to publish a single line of code in 2019. Based on a research of 2,000 startups by the Coincodecap project, 640 were completely inactive.

32% of token projects have not pushed a single line of code in 2019 #cryptocurrency https://t.co/k5Jhfg3DsA

— Nelson M. Rosario (@NelsonMRosario) September 23, 2019

This number comes as no surprise, as only a handful of projects take the top spots when it comes to GitHub commits. However, the sign is especially ominous, as former ICO startups sink into obscurity or simply fail.

“Crypto landscape is full of lies and empty promises. To make this ecosystem better we need to weed out projects which are not fulfilling their promises made to investors,” commented the Coincodecap project.

The analysis of Coincodecap, which links exchange rate success with code commits, reveals that the assets belonging to the inactive projects have a market capitalization of $415 million. The most striking example was the Proton Token project, which has not published new code since 2018.

One of the reasons for the weak activity is that creating a new blockchain project can be relatively simple, especially if the token is built over the Ethereum network. Multiple projects have promised to launch their own blockchains in the past, but few moved to creating a new network during the bear market for altcoins.

But even actively publishing projects have slowed down their activity. Big coins like Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and Monero (XMR) have diminished their pace of commits. Previous champions Komodo (KMD) and Lisk (LSK) also slowed their production.

YoBit Trades 62 Inactive Projects

Highly inactive projects also show a prevalence on a handful of exchanges that have a reputation of listing relatively obscure projects. YoBit is the leading exchange, hosting 62 tokens or coins with not a line of code written in 2019.

The slowdown in production coincided with the loss of runway for most cryptocurrency projects, especially those that raised funds at the peak of the market. With Ethereum (ETH) dropping to $200, multiple projects could not meet their development requirements.

In the crypto space, it is nothing new for projects to die down. But for now, most inactive startups continue to see at least some trading.

What do you make of these appalling figures? Add your thoughts below!

Images via Shutterstock, Twitter @NelsonMRosario

The post 640 Crypto Projects Have Failed to Publish a Single Line of Code This Year appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.

Similar to Notcoin - TapSwap on Solana Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Emerald Crypto (EMD) на Currencies.ru

$ 0.0095806 (+7.58%)
Объем 24H $0
Изменеия 24h: 2.35 %, 7d: -7.78 %
Cегодня L: $0.0086651 - H: $0.0095806
Капитализация $183.154k Rank 1690
Цена в час новости $ 0.0413084 (-76.81%)

line single projects crypto 640 code failed

line single → Результатов: 27


640 Crypto Projects Out of 2,000 Haven’t Published a SIngle Line of Code in 2019: Report

Combined market cap of these cryptos is $415 million Ethereum, EOS, Cardano, Lisk Leads the Github Activity Exchanges prioritizing their own interest “Crypto landscape is full of lies and empty promises,” states the report analyzing cryptocurrencies’ Github activity, by CoinCodeCap, a code analysis, reporting, and API services for cryptocurrencies technology provider. On analyzing the development […]

2019-9-25 19:36


Arcblock Releases Dapp and Decentralized Identity Developer Testing Tool to Simplify Development of Blockchain Apps

ArcBlock, a leading blockchain application platform, and ecosystem has released the DApps Workshop, an easy to use developer tool that gives developers, businesses and product managers an easy way to build prototypes and POCs to validate different DApp and decentralized identity scenarios.

2019-6-17 21:41


Y Combinator-Supported Mudrex Expands To A Larger Audience Creating Crypto Trading Bots

Mudrex Expands To A Larger Audience Creating Crypto Trading Bots After several months of operating in a closed beta, Y Cominator’s Mudrex aims at expanding to a wider audience around the world. In this way, traders will have the possibility to automate their strategies without having to write any single line of code. Y Combinator […]

2019-2-23 20:48


Developer Corbin Page Launches “Eth This Then That” the IFTTT for Ethereum

The Ethereum developer and the co-founder & product lead at Meridio released “Eth This Then That,” the IFTTT for Ethereum. The information was released by Mr. Page on Twitter on February 17. With ETTT, anyone will be able to connect different decentralized applications and decentralized finance components without having to write a single line of […]

2019-2-19 06:16


Encrybit ICO

- ENCRYBIT THE RESEARCH BASED CRYPTOCURRENCY EXCHANGE Encrybit made history moments creating massive surveys in cryptocurrency market with 12k+ responses from traders among 167 countries. Encrybit exchange is thought of traders where we are merging their demands in reality developing the secured and featured enriched trading platform that does not want to compromise the emotions of traders.

2018-11-14 19:41


STARKs, Part I: Proofs with Polynomials

Special thanks to Eli Ben-Sasson for ongoing help, explanations and review, coming up with some of the examples used in this post, and most crucially of all inventing a lot of this stuff; thanks to Hsiao-wei Wang for reviewing Hopefully many people by now have heard of ZK-SNARKs, the general-purpose succinct zero knowledge proof technology that can be used for all sorts of usecases ranging from verifiable computation to privacy-preserving cryptocurrency.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03