Uniswap Foundation Discloses Assets Amid Fee Mechanism Vote

2024-5-26 20:57

The Uniswap Foundation announced that on-chain voting for a proposal to establish its new fee mechanism will occur by May 31.

This announcement has boosted the value of the network’s native token, UNI, by over 20%.

Uniswap’s New Fee Mechanism and Its Implications

The Uniswap Foundation outlined a crucial step towards implementing autonomous fee collection and distribution in Uniswap V3 pools.

“If passed, this proposal would transfer ownership of the mainnet UniswapV3Factory to a newly deployed instance of V3FactoryOwner. This vote will not turn on fees; that will be accomplished in a future proposal,” the Foundation explained.

In February, the Uniswap Foundation proposed a fee reward mechanism for UNI token holders to boost governance participation. Initial responses showed strong support for the proposal despite potential legal challenges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against the DeFi protocol.

Traditionally, all fees generated by Uniswap went to liquidity providers (LPs) who supplied assets to the platform. The new proposal plans to distribute protocol fees among staked and delegated UNI token holders. Therefore incentivizing active participation within its ecosystem.

According to CryptoFees, Uniswap earned approximately $3.2 million in fees in the past 24 hours, averaging $3.4 million over the last week. The protocol handles roughly 30% of total trades in the decentralized finance sector.

Read more: 12 Best Decentralized Exchanges for 2024

Top 5 Crypto Fee Generators. Source: CryptoFees

In a parallel development, the Uniswap Foundation disclosed holding $41.41 million in fiat and stablecoins and 730,000 UNI tokens as of the end of the first quarter. During this period, the Foundation committed $4.34 million in new grants and disbursed $2.79 million in previously committed grants.

“The fiat (USD) cash and stables are to be used for grant making and operating activities and the UNI for employee token awards,” the Foundation remarked.

The post Uniswap Foundation Discloses Assets Amid Fee Mechanism Vote appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Fee Active Collateral Token (FACT) на Currencies.ru

$ 0.5202 (-0.19%)
Объем 24H $4.103k
Изменеия 24h: 3.61 %, 7d: -8.01 %
Cегодня L: $0.5166 - H: $0.5216
Капитализация $0 Rank 3111
Доступно / Всего 0 FACT / 15.402m FACT

fee mechanism uniswap discloses vote assets amid

fee mechanism → Результатов: 35


Фото:

Here’s All You Need to Know About Ether’s First Deflationary Week

Ether (ETH) may achieve a deflationary asset status sooner than expected, as more and more ETH continues to get burnt each day via the gas fee burn mechanism implemented during the London upgrade. Ether’s First Deflationary Week While Satoshi Nakamoto’s bitcoin (BTC) remains the world’s number one deflationary cryptocurrency, ether (ETH) is making steady progressRead More

2021-11-4 16:00


Фото:

A Bug Making Ethereum Transactions on Exchanges Vulnerable Has Been Fixed

A bug centering around a new Ethereum token, GasToken, which was enabling abuse on cryptocurrency exchanges, appears to have been resolved. The details are provided in a report originally published on November 13, 2018, that discussed how the bug was exploited by attackers, and what digital platforms could do if they wished to protect their hot wallet funds.

2018-11-22 00:34


Фото:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03


Tokenizing Trading Fees With Mining Mechanism – Is It Good or Bad for Exchange Platform Users?

ABCC is another exchange trying to reward users with AT and ToM. Today we are going to discover how bitcoin-like mechanism and a principle of fixed number of tokens generated via half-life cycle with Simultaneous Release differentiate the new approach from others While some want to lower the exchange fee, the others reward traders.

2018-7-9 15:04