The Graph Now Exploring Support for Bitcoin, Polkadot, Solana, BSC & Other Layer 1 Blockchains

2021-1-31 17:13

After successfully launching its mainnet on Ethereum blockchain, The Graph protocol for indexing and querying data is now exploring providing support for additional Layer 1 blockchains.

Blockchain interoperability is a pain point for developers. Amidst the growing DeFi and NFT spaces, applications need to interact with many protocols and chains, reads the official announcement while noting over 7,000 subgraphs are deployed to date. The team said,

“Additional Layer 1 integrations will dramatically increase the number of subgraphs and the ability for dApps to work in a multi-blockchain environment to give users optionality and the best Web3 experience.”

The blockchains under consideration include Bitcoin, Polkadot, NEAR, Cosmos, Solana, Avalanche, Binance Smart Chain, and Celo to support Web3 development and make it easy for developers to access on-chain data and build decentralized applications.

Already many Ethereum projects have built subgraphs to retrieve data, including Uniswap, Aave, Synthetix, ENS, and DAostack. Eva Beylin, Director at The Graph Foundation, said,

“After launching mainnet, we are looking to accelerate the upward trajectory of the Web3 ecosystem. That means ensuring that no matter which Layer 1 blockchain you are building on, you can build a subgraph and easily access data from across chains. We think this is a key part of unlocking that next wave of innovation on the decentralized internet.”

The community is currently conducting due diligence on Layer 1’s infrastructure, and they are expected to be onboarded in the coming months.

However, Ethereum will remain the standard, and GRT an ERC20 token, said the team.

The Graph Network’s native $889 million market cap GRT token is currently trading at $0.713 and enjoying an uptrend. It is also up over 101% YTD.

The post The Graph Now Exploring Support for Bitcoin, Polkadot, Solana, BSC & Other Layer 1 Blockchains first appeared on BitcoinExchangeGuide.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

UniGraph (GRAPH) на Currencies.ru

$ 6.7986 (+2.07%)
Объем 24H $0
Изменеия 24h: 13.81 %, 7d: 16.67 %
Cегодня L: $6.7986 - H: $6.7986
Капитализация $0 Rank 3736
Доступно / Всего 0 GRAPH / 100k GRAPH

layer blockchains blockchain exploring support graph data

layer blockchains → Результатов: 35


Sidechains vs Plasma vs Sharding

Special thanks to Jinglan Wang for review and feedback One question that often comes up is: how exactly is sharding different from sidechains or Plasma? All three architectures seem to involve a hub-and-spoke architecture with a central “main chain” that serves as the consensus backbone of the system, and a set of “child” chains containing actual user-level transactions.

2019-6-14 04:03


What is Celer Network (CELR)? Complete Review and Guide For Beginners

Off-chain scaling has been one of the more popular solutions that are being considered for the issue of low throughputs on modern decentralized blockchains. Second layer platforms that would take most of the load off the actual blockchain can create an environment where it’s possible to exchange cryptocurrency in a fast, easy, and secure manner.

2019-3-29 03:13


Фото:

Op Ed: With Bitcoin, Anarchy Is the Point, Not the Problem

Last week, there was a panel at SXSW that was effectively a debate on the merits of permissioned blockchains versus permissionless systems like Bitcoin. I listened to the entire audio of the panel discussion, after Programming Bitcoin author Jimmy Song tweeted it out the other day, and I thought he did an awesome job of pointing out the key value proposition of Bitcoin and why it is not worth comparing to permissioned systems.

2019-3-23 17:29


Nervos ICO

Nervos is network of scalable and interoperable blockchains built on top of an open network, built for the enterprise. It has its own public permissionless blockchain as the base layer protocol, which is called the Nervos Common Knowledge Base (CKB).

2018-7-30 19:33


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03