The jury is still out on whether that meeting between the two gazillionaires and “the leading Bitcoin miners in North America” was positive or nefarious. Part of the Bitcoin community interpreted it as a shrewd PR move and supported the Bitcoin Mining Council. The others smell centralization, are suspicious of closed-door meetings and rejected it. However, what do we really know about the meeting? Not much. So, let’s explore the case further.

It all started with these dual tweets:

Yesterday I was pleased to host a meeting between @elonmusk & the leading Bitcoin miners in North America. The miners have agreed to form the Bitcoin Mining Council to promote energy usage transparency & accelerate sustainability initiatives worldwide. https://t.co/EHgLZ9zvDK

— Michael Saylor (@michael_saylor) May 24, 2021

Of course, Bitcoinist was on the case and promptly expanded the information about the Council. The meeting was between MicroStrategy’s Saylor, Tesla’s Musk, and:

Executives from major bitcoin miners in North America, including Argo Blockchain, Blockcap, Core Scientific, Galaxy Digital, and HIVE Blockch.

“The newly-formed Bitcoin Mining Council is the next logical step in fostering a sectoral shift to renewable energy,” said Peter Wall, chief executive of Argo Blockchain, in a written statement to Forbes

While some Bitcoiners saw this as necessary to fight the environmental FUD reanimated by Elon’s tweet, others focused on the words “Council,” “major,” and “leading.” Are the rich and famous once again trying to take over Bitcoin or is this a genuine movement aimed at taking control of the narrative back?

Related Reading | MicroStrategy Acquires An Additional $15 Million in Bitcoin

Sensing a potential PR disaster, members of the Bitcoin Mining Council took immediate action. Both Galaxy Digital’s Amanda Fabiano and Argo’s Wall took to Twitter to make their case: that the council’s main objective is “energy transparency.”

Well said, Amanda.

This is about promoting energy transparency and improving sustainable mining practices.

Nothing more. https://t.co/OiXcj2rgFk

— Peter Wall (@PeterGWall) May 25, 2021

In her thread, Fabiano justified the Council’s existence saying “we need to be transparent and we should encourage others to be transparent too.”

Instead of standing by and continuing to write pieces on the topic and hope that this issue goes away, a group of miners came together to say, look we need to be transparent and we should encourage others to be transparent too.

Maybe the word council was too strong.

— Amanda Fabiano (@_amanda_fab) May 25, 2021

A few minutes later, Saylor went to battle for them and twisted the knife a little by saying that the Council met “to talk about the energy challenges we face, both real & imagined…”

This weekend, some #Bitcoin miners came together to talk about the energy challenges we face, both real & imagined, and work on solutions together for the good of the entire industry. Details below: https://t.co/fo9fs9ghuy

— Michael Saylor (@michael_saylor) May 25, 2021

Imagined by who? Who could Saylor be talking about there?

The show “First Move” with Julia Chatterley, transmitted by CNN, interviewed the CEO of Marathon Digital Holdings. Fred Thiel was present on the call with Musk and Saylor and said its purpose was:

To help Elon understand really how power is used by the bitcoin mining industry and the bitcoin mining industry’s commitment to using carbon-neutral power. 

Then, of course, he toed the “transparency” party line:

One of the reasons for the formation of this group is to be transparent about energy use, to educate the marketplace about how bitcoin mining is really an energy consumer of last resort, how we use a lot of energy that otherwise would be wasted. Bitcoin miners don’t consume huge amounts of energy harmful for the environment. A lot are carbon neutral. As we continue to move towards carbon neutrality, we will be an enabler for the industry that provides renewable energy to try new technologies.

He makes a few good points there. Like a cleaning monster, Bitcoin tends to go where there’s wasted energy to consume. Plus, it’s the perfect incentive for renewable energy companies to innovate and create new clean sources. They will not risk experimentation if there’s not a market for the energy. Bitcoin is that market.

Precisely Marathon Digital Holdings is one of the companies that the Bitcoin community has a problem with. In the most platinum awarded and discussed comment in the Reddit thread about this whole story, power-user Fiach Dubh accused Marathon of having: 

The bright idea to only include “OFAC approved” transactions inside the Bitcoin Blocks they mine. great, you’re allowed to do that! Even if it means you lose mining revenue for doing so, and even if it means you still include OFAC violating transactions in your blocks. 

The Bitcoin community fears censorship for those who don’t play by the Council’s standards and smells centralization and miner’s consolidation.

Related Reading | By The Numbers: Here’s How Much MicroStrategy Has Made On Bitcoin

Luckily for CoinDesk, they had Michael Saylor as a speaker in Consensus 2021, their very own conference. Saylor expressed that he wanted to help find a way for Bitcoin to share its complicated but amazing story. About the Council, he said:

The group is more interested in “managing concerns, especially from uninformed parties,” about bitcoin’s energy usage, the CEO said. 

“We need to make sure that people that are hostile to bitcoin and hostile to the crypto industry aren’t defining these narratives and defining those models and defining those metrics,” he said. “In the absence of any good information or any response on our part, they will define those models.”

And that’s all we know so far about the Bitcoin Miners Council.

Bitcoin price in Telegram @btc_price_every_hour

294 +