The Bitcoin Customer Service Department

2022-6-22 16:00

In order to orange-pill the world, Bitcoiners must foster connection and trust, rather than create frustration and division for those who are curious.

Maxx Mannheimer is a former sales account manager with a background in training and industrial-organizational psychology.

In a decentralized network, we are all customers, we are all sales, we are all operations, we are all IT and we are all customer support. Operations and IT have been killing it without a doubt. The physical migration of the mining hashrate in the last two years has been miraculous and the network has zero downtime. However, Bitcoin has a customer service problem. As a result, we are suppressing sales and market share.

Just to paint a picture, imagine yourself calling up a customer support line, telling them you don’t understand the product, and the representative responds by telling you to “have fun staying poor.” Maybe you would appreciate that frankness, but I can assure you that a business operating in that way would not survive long. By comparison, Bitcoiners fight with shitcoiners, no-coiners, fiat sympathizers and even with each other. We’ve created an intellectual mosh pit and many of us are proud of it.

Trust me, I understand the frustration of hearing NPC (non-player character) responses to valid critiques of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). I have been a Bitcoin evangelist for so long that I have lost friends and caused others to think I’m a loon. I sincerely doubt that I’ve had a conversation longer than an hour over the last three years that didn’t include some mention of Bitcoin. I’ve made Ethereum heads salty, Ripple fanatics quiet, and non-fungible token (NFT) enthusiasts feel stupid. On the flip side I've orange-pilled dozens of people and even minted a few wholecoiners through education and persistence. I wouldn't change a thing about the process.

In my estimation, that intense evangelism was an important stage in my process of fully understanding Bitcoin. I also know that in the early days of my understanding, I participated in all the behaviors I now condemn. Most Bitcoiners had to walk through the shadow of the valley of scams before seeing the light. My harsh responses to the reflections of my former self are ultimately not constructive; they are projected regret and anger I have in myself for not understanding Bitcoin sooner.

There is so much trauma and anger in the world, much of which is caused by the global fiat banking system through wars, incarceration, a torturous medical system, manipulation of markets, expropriation of assets and corruption of the food, soil, water and the air. Frankly, it’s disgusting and infuriating to witness. I see avoidable atrocities unfold continuously with no definite indication of when the tide will turn.

For those who are unaware of bitcoin or not invested, this feeling of hopelessness must run much deeper. The despair is twofold. On one hand they are on a sinking ship and are unaware (or skeptical) of the function of the orange life rafts. Perhaps they are in denial that the ship is sinking at all, despite my jumping up and down shouting about the iceberg we smashed into. Regardless, they are missing out on the investment of a lifetime which will only breed further regret.

Those who are aware of the parallel reality being forged by Bitcoiners often look on in horror as we verbally slaughter each other or anyone we perceive as a threat. A large part of the Bitcoin community has accepted identities as toxic psychopaths and I understand why. We have created a robust culture and I have no criticism of “toxic maximalism.” It serves and will continue to serve an important purpose during this time. However, this article is about looking into the future and I have some questions I would like to pose for reflection.

The most important factor supporting the expansion of a network is the reduction of barriers to entry. The practical barriers have never been lower. We have seen a massive increase in the number and size of institutions who are buying and selling bitcoin. However, an ideological barrier remains.

If you are reading this you’re probably aware of the Marxist buffoonery that has permeated mainstream media and academics. I unconsciously fell victim to much of that mentality myself for years before realizing that it is rooted in violence and coercion. I look back and see that I was mistaken, but I also look back at my good intentions. At the time, I didn’t know that what we have been experiencing has not been capitalism since December 23, 1913. This is not common knowledge.

I now see the systemic corruption of incentives for human action, but these orange lenses didn’t come easily. It took years of intellectual exercise, years of reading and years of fighting the prevailing narrative which is propagandized at every turn. It took immense personal willpower in refraining from unproductive activities, social media, mainstream news and most other forms of entertainment.

Does it serve me to feel bitter that others haven’t worked as hard as I have? Is it fair for me to expect others to follow in my footsteps? Or more importantly, is it pragmatic?

Is there utility in me treating those who don’t understand Bitcoin as though they are stupid?

Given the endless hamster wheel of life in the fiat mess, I fully understand why people don’t trudge off on intense intellectual inspection of the history of money and the understanding of Bitcoin. Bitcoin is frequently overlooked or misunderstood because it is so multidisciplinary that it appears frivolous if viewed from a single perspective. Developing a holistic understanding of Bitcoin is not a simple undertaking. My own journey has included writings on economics, history, philosophy, politics, psychology, technology and even theology.

Can I truly expect someone living in a world which is designed to keep us stressed, scared, suspicious and busy to take this time and effort to understand an emergent technology? Would I want someone to feel as certain about Bitcoin as I do just by listening to my opinion? My answer to both of those questions is a resounding no.

Anger and toxicity represent a thin veil over a tremendous pain. Pain which was not caused by Bitcoin, but by the world into which Bitcoin was created. This pain will subside as the price increases and the fear will subside as the network grows. There will be a next stage in the emotional development of Bitcoiners and it looks like stoic confidence in what we know is true. It looks like Bitcoiners setting an example for the world to follow. It looks like Bitcoiners being so productive and charitable that any criticism of them will look ridiculous by comparison.

Bitcoiners know that the success of this network means the end of industrial war, the end of debt slavery, and the end of environmental damage at the global scale. Might it be more advantageous for us to focus on communications and marketing rather than fighting a battle that has already been won? Might it be more advantageous for us to be supportive to each other and new prospective Bitcoiners?

Of course, when I say prospective Bitcoiners, I am talking about every living human on this planet, and those yet to be born. Help us paint a picture of the peace which follows hyperbitcoinization. Let images of that inevitable future permeate your mind and the tone of your conversation. Share the knowledge you have in a way which supports others and be honest about your own limitations. Customer service can be a frustrating position, but it's an important one. Foster connection and trust, rather than frustration and division. Our future customers will thank you.

This is a guest post by Maxx Mannheimer. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc. or Bitcoin Magazine.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

TrustPlus (TRUST) на Currencies.ru

$ 0.00388 (+0.00%)
Объем 24H $0
Изменеия 24h: 0.00 %, 7d: -44.03 %
Cегодня L: $0.00388 - H: $0.00388
Капитализация $135.274k Rank 99999
Доступно / Всего 34.865m TRUST

create rather trust frustration division curious those

create rather → Результатов: 61


Фото:

Tipb.ch App Allows You to Share a Short URL Rather Than a BCH Address on Social Media

On March 23, the creator of the blog platform read.cash and the social media application noise.cash revealed a new project called tipb.ch. The application allows anyone to create a customizable short address that can be used for tips rather than having to share a long BCH address on social media platforms. Platform Tipb.ch Allows You […]

2021-3-24 07:30


Trusted third parties should issue stablecoins, not Facebook- eToro believes partnering with authorized partners is the key to success for Libra

If Facebook’s Libra project is to succeed it should use stablecoins issued by regulated third parties rather than create its own crypto-assets, that’s the conclusion of a new position paper publisThe post Trusted third parties should issue stablecoins, not Facebook- eToro believes partnering with authorized partners is the key to success for Libra appeared first on AMBCrypto.

2019-11-29 15:30


Cryptocurrency Rises 382% in a Day, Smells of a Potential Rekt’d Token Scam in Making

Cryptocurrency space is flooded with thousands of tokens and a new one gets added every other day. The vision behind Bitcoin was to create a decentralized currency system to give power in the hands of the community, rather than a big financial institution and banks holding a monopoly over people's money. However, as the popularity […]

2019-4-9 17:49


On Collusion

Special thanks to Glen Weyl, Phil Daian and Jinglan Wang for review Over the last few years there has been an increasing interest in using deliberately engineered economic incentives and mechanism design to align behavior of participants in various contexts.

2019-4-5 04:03


Фото:

TRON CEO: Bitcoin Holds Greater Promise for Younger Generation of Investors

Justin Sun believes that Bitcoin (BTC) and other cryptocurrencies have the potential to create opportunities for the younger generation of investors. TRON’s CEO also implied that critics of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies were focused on the business side of things rather than the more profound technological implications virtual currencies provide within the emerging digital economy.

2019-3-14 16:00


Ethereum Creator Suffers Blowback for Proposing New Crypto Wallet Fees

Ethereum creator Vitalik Buterin has proposed a “sustainable” way to fund cryptocurrency wallet development: a tiny per-transaction fee that goes to the wallet’s developers. Ethereum Creator: Crypto Wallets Should Charge Transaction Fees In his view, the fee should be the smallest unit of Ethereum and should be a flat fee, rather than a percentage, so as not to “create a perverse incentive to not optimize gas fees.

2019-3-9 02:00


A CBC Casper Tutorial

In order to help more people understand “the other Casper” (Vlad Zamfir’s CBC Casper), and specifically the instantiation that works best for blockchain protocols, I thought that I would write an explainer on it myself, from a less abstract and more “close to concrete usage” point of view.

2018-12-6 04:03


Фото:

Federal Election Committee Asked to Consider Crypto Mining for Political Contributions

OsiaNetwork LLC has reached out to the Federal Election Committee (FEC) in the hopes that it will allow computer sharing for crypto mining for campaign donations. Osia says it would like to be the platform in which volunteers share their computer power to mine cryptocurrencies, which are then donated to political campaigns of their choice.

2018-10-5 23:57


NHCT ICO

NHCT is a total health management platform that is built on the philosophy of preventive rather than reactive medical care`. It uses blockchain to counter systemic and technological issues that plague healthcare of today like high costs, data fragmentation & data security.

2018-9-25 20:03


Parkade ICO

There’s a worldwide parking crisis, and it’s growing each year. Populations are on the rise and usable land is scarce in major cities. There are billions of cars across the globe. They all need somewhere to park, but there are simply not enough spaces.

2018-8-17 17:22


Фото:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03


PopChest ICO

The POP Network is a decentralized approach to monetized video distribution using direct micropayments and token incentives instead of relying on advertising and paid subscriptions. The result is a system where Creators form direct relationships with their consumers, are liberated creatively, and get economically rewarded in a fair, transparent manner.

2018-7-2 17:20