Introduction

Today, millions of people use decentralized finance (DeFi) systems for investment, trading, lending, and borrowing. Decentralization has benefited those who are not satisfied with intermediaries such as banks. Recent uptrend in Bitcoin’s worth and exponential returns yielded by different altcoins in 2017 and 2021 attracted investors from various fields. It will not be an exaggeration to say that cryptocurrencies made millionaires overnight, something that sounded like a fairytale before the emergence of blockchain technology. Besides multiple benefits, the crypto market is full of dangers lurking in every corner, ready to pounce upon the victims who fail to stay vigilant. One of these dangers is the Sybil attack.

If you use social media, you must have come across accounts run by the same person with many fake identities. It was so common that many common people did it mischievously a few years ago, but tighter regulations have helped prevent it to a great extent. Yet many clever users still find a way to create fake accounts and use them for nefarious purposes. A Sybil attack is a security threat posed by an individual or an organization that runs various nodes from fake identities. The term itself is the actual name of a woman, Sybil Dorsett, who suffered from multiple personality disorder.

Sybil attacks are dangerous in a blockchain network as the perpetrator can outnumber honest users when it comes to voting, decision-making, or mutual communication. At its extreme, a 51% attack can happen if a network of bad actors set themselves at the task of creating fake identities.

Decentralization is the hallmark of blockchain technology, which means the control is not in the hands of a central authority, but shared by independent users. The whole network of miners or validators is not related to each other, so they cannot conspire to stage any upheaval. Sybil attacks tend to destroy decentralization as many nodes belong to one person in reality, who could manipulate governance decisions, voting, and protocol-level upgrades.

As hinted earlier, a 51% attack can happen if the attackers gain a majority on a blockchain network. Such an attack enables the attacker to reorder transactions, block transaction confirmation, or even perform double-spending by reversing previously completed payments. Again, what gets hit most is the decentralization of the network that now comes in control of a few.

Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and X do require certain verification that hinders freehand blind creation of numerous accounts. This is not the case on blockchains, which allow anyone to join without permission. Attackers exploit this vulnerability and create thousands of identities quickly by using automated scripts.

In addition to the exploitation of protocol-level vulnerabilities on established blockchains, sybil wallets are also able to claim massive token airdrops worth millions of dollars. The new network is easily fooled by fake identities created by the attackers.

Sybil attacks cause many types of damage to the blockchain they attack. The damage includes not only financial losses but also reputational damage. A sybil attack crowds the network with fake identities, which intentionally slows down transaction processing and negatively affects peer-to-peer communication. Regular honest users find it difficult to access blockchain services as the network is dominated by malicious identities.

In an environment where decentralized finance is expanding via adoption, Sybil attacks bring unfairness and undermine transparency. Sybil wallets start trading with one another to show the world that trading activity is increasing. Potential investors see the volume bars rising and buy the project. Sybil wallets now use the new investors as their exit liquidity and dump the tokens on them.

Moreover, attackers also succeed in opening fake social media accounts and propagate their narrative on the platform, which innocent users trust and get into the project that is being shilled by the accounts. Such coordinated manipulation causes serious damage to the market as a whole.

Last year, the case of MYX Finance Airdrop caught readers’ attention as sybil wallets claimed millions of dollars in token airdrops, which analysts recognized later as a sybil attack due to the same pattern of transactions. Blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps identified around 100 newly created wallets that claimed about 9.8 million MYX tokens, worth roughly 170 million dollars at the time.

Cybil attacks also proved to be a cybersecurity issue as it targeted infrastructure systems such as decentralized storage networks and medical Internet of Things networks. The purpose behind the attack on the non-financial system is also a ladder to get money by other means. They steal data from the medical devices and sell it to pharmaceutical companies.

Consensus mechanism is the first line of defense for blockchains, especially Proof-of-work networks like Bitcoin. So much computing power and electricity is required to validate transactions that it becomes practically useless for sybil attackers to run many nodes. It becomes all the more useless when the attackers consider the fact that their success in the malicious activity is highly uncertain. Potential wastage of resources dissuades bad actors from carrying out sybil attacks.

On proof-of-stake mechanism, significant amounts of assets are to be locked to run a validator node. Running many nodes is tantamount to losing all of them in case the network spots the attacker’s intentions, which it ultimately does. Additionally, delegated or reputation-based mechanisms reward long-term honest participation. In short, strong blockchains make sybil attacks so expensive that the attackers have to think dozens of times before embarking on any malicious adventure.

When attackers grow more and more sophisticated, the developers also feel the pressure and devise more effective ways to shield their chains and projects. Advanced analytics and machine learning have recently come to the fore as modern methods to combat sybil attacks. The use of AI is also beneficial in sorting out coordinated activity from millions of transactions. Some platforms experiment with biometric authentication, social reputation scoring, or community-based verification to ensure each participant represents a real individual. Granted that no solution is perfect, yet continuous innovation has improved detection accuracy.

Sybil attacks remain one of the most serious threats to the integrity and fairness of blockchain networks. By creating fake identities, attackers can undermine decentralization, manipulate markets, and erode user trust. While modern consensus mechanisms, analytics tools, and detection technologies have made such attacks increasingly costly and difficult, no system is completely immune. Therefore, sustained innovation, stronger security practices, and user awareness are essential to preserving the long-term stability and credibility of decentralized ecosystems.

Bitcoin price in Telegram @btc_price_every_hour

89 +