Russian Secret Service Demanded $1M Bitcoin Bribe From Media Mogul

Russian Secret Service Demanded $1M Bitcoin Bribe From Media Mogul
ôîòî ïîêàçàíî ñ : bitcoinist.com

2019-4-20 23:00

Bitcoin hit the headlines in Russia again this week after it emerged the country’s law enforcement had tried to extract a bitcoin bribe worth $1 million.

FSB Illegally Sought $1.02 Million

As local cryptocurrency news media outlet Coinspot.io reported April 17, a scandal involving Russia’s secret police and the ex-head of one of the country’s biggest newspapers has boiled over, with both parties now finding themselves under arrest.

According to an ongoing court case, up to 15 members of Russia’s FSB secret service may have tried to squeeze 65 million rubles ($1.02 million) out of the estate of a media mogul in return for his freedom.

The suspect, Izvestiya ex-CEO Erast Galumov, is allegedly wanted on charges of fraud involving 43 million rubles ($670,000). Lawyers continue to query whether any wrongdoing ever took place.

According to events which have now come to light, members of an FSB bureau in Moscow, charged with investigating IT-related crimes, ended up using a pseudonym to threaten Galimov’s family.

In return for Galimov’s freedom and their safety, they said, the family would have to transfer ransom money exclusively in Bitcoin to an arranged recipient.

One of the two figures in charge of the operation, an agent by the name of Kolbov, orchestrated the bribe under the name Mikhail, also telling Gamilov’s son he should leave Russia to avoid “doing time for his father.”

In the event, several instalments of the bribe reached Kolbov and fellow perpetrator, agent Sergey Belorusov, as part of a sting operation.

A Moscow court is now determining the fate of the agents, while Galimov will nonetheless still have to protest his innocence as his own legal battle continues.

Bitcoin, Regulation And Government Impotence

The embarrassment adds further fuel to the fire regarding Russia’s increasingly erratic attempts to control cryptocurrency use.

As Bitcoinist reported Friday, lawmakers appear unable to get to grips with the nature of decentralized networks, reflected in their latest plans to impose investment limits on Bitcoin and altcoins.

Russia has long sought to introduce hard-and-fast regulation of crypto, the expectation being that new laws will come into effect in Q4 this year. The language of the bills, critics say, nonetheless remains overly broad and fails to describe the nature of the phenomenon adequately.

Earlier in April, Bitcoinist also noted a surprising claim by a Kremlin economist that the Russian government has been covertly amassing Bitcoin worth $8.6 billion.

Last week, meanwhile, the same economist ridiculed plans by Russia and China to launch a gold-backed cryptocurrency, saying it would be automatically inferior to Bitcoin.

What do you think about the Russian police bribe scandal? Let us know in the comments below!

Images via Shutterstock

The post Russian Secret Service Demanded $1M Bitcoin Bribe From Media Mogul appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Bitcoin (BTC) íà Currencies.ru

$ 97070.07 (-0.49%)
Îáúåì 24H $97.364b
Èçìåíåèÿ 24h: 2.49 %, 7d: 9.74 %
Cåãîäíÿ L: $94006.77 - H: $98156.69
Êàïèòàëèçàöèÿ $1920.575b Rank 1
Öåíà â ÷àñ íîâîñòè $ 5274.01 (1740.54%)

bitcoin bribe media secret russian country million

bitcoin bribe → Ðåçóëüòàòîâ: 5


Bulgarian officials took Bitcoin bribes to issue passports to Ukrainians

Two Bulgarian government reps have been arrested on allegations of accepting bribes in Bitcoin in return for illegitimately issuing Bulgarian identity documents to foreign individuals. Court files claim the accused, both of whom held management positions in the National Agency for Bulgarian Citizens Abroad, have been illegally receiving payments to issue documents, according to local outlet NOVA.

2018-11-2 19:03


Ôîòî:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03