Recent Bitcoin Rally Pushes ‘Addresses in Profit’ to 93%

2020-7-29 22:34

August 2019 was the last time this many bitcoin addresses were in profit.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Profit Hunters Coin (PHC) на Currencies.ru

$ 0 (+0.00%)
Объем 24H $0
Изменеия 24h: 0.00 %, 7d: 0.00 %
Cегодня L: $0 - H: $0
Капитализация $0 Rank 99999
Доступно / Всего 0 PHC

profit addresses bitcoin time many pushes rally

profit addresses → Результатов: 26


1.17M Bitcoin Addresses Will Be in the Red if BTC Breaks This Level

Recent data by IntoTheBlock shows a crash to $9,000 could potentially send 1. 17 million Bitcoin (BTC) addresses below the profit line.    Still A Lot of Bitcoin Traders Trapped Above $10K Based on data collected by blockchain analysts, the latest bitcoin flash crash toward $9,600 support levels has meant that even more wallet addresses containing BTC are now ‘out of the money’.

2020-2-20 22:00


Majority of Bitcoin holders are still in profit, $6,649 could be BTC’s key support level

Despite Bitcoin’s recent bearish condition and low market sentiment, the majority of Bitcoin holders are still in profit, according to data from the crypto analytics platform IntotheBlock. Just over 59 percent of addresses hold Bitcoin bought with an average purchase price below $7,470, putting them “in the money” on unrealized gains even after the cryptocurrency’s […] The post Majority of Bitcoin holders are still in profit, $6,649 could be BTC’s key support level appeared first on CryptoSlate.

2019-10-25 12:30


Фото:

A Bug Making Ethereum Transactions on Exchanges Vulnerable Has Been Fixed

A bug centering around a new Ethereum token, GasToken, which was enabling abuse on cryptocurrency exchanges, appears to have been resolved. The details are provided in a report originally published on November 13, 2018, that discussed how the bug was exploited by attackers, and what digital platforms could do if they wished to protect their hot wallet funds.

2018-11-22 00:34


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03