2023-10-12 03:36 |
The initial impact amounted to 20 Ether, worth $31,000, while the validator involved has now been taken offline.
Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024
2023-10-12 03:36 |
The initial impact amounted to 20 Ether, worth $31,000, while the validator involved has now been taken offline.
Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024
Bankrupt crypto lender Celsius has restaked over $750 milllion worth of Ethereum during the first two days of this month. The post Celsius Restakes $753M Ethereum, Pushes Validator Queue to 45 Days appeared first on BeInCrypto.
2023-6-3 12:42 | |
A Rogue Ethereum validator stole over $25 million worth of cryptocurrencies from an Ethereum MEV bot conducting sandwich trades. The post Malicious Ethereum Verifiers Are Allegedly Attacking the Network appeared first on BeInCrypto.
2023-4-3 19:00 | |
With 2020 now in the past, 2021 is already moving full steam ahead with the crypto market setting new highs and industry leader Crypto. com kick-starting the new year with exclusive CRO rewards. Here’s how you can sign up to become a Crossfire validator and earn your share of $300,000 worth of CRO rewards.
2021-1-4 15:32 | |
Special thanks to Jinglan Wang for review and feedback One question that often comes up is: how exactly is sharding different from sidechains or Plasma? All three architectures seem to involve a hub-and-spoke architecture with a central “main chain” that serves as the consensus backbone of the system, and a set of “child” chains containing actual user-level transactions.
2019-6-14 04:03 | |
Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.
2018-7-21 23:03 | |
In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.
2018-7-21 23:03 | |