Google announced on Tuesday the search engine will begin allowing regulated prediction markets to run Google Ads starting Jan. 21, provided they comply with strict policy guidelines and local laws. Perhaps more importantly, the move means Google has formally categorized regulated prediction markets as financial services, not gambling.

For an industry that has spent the last year fighting the “gambling” label in courtrooms, regulatory hearings, and on social media, this is a significant validation of how CFTC-regulated platforms want to be seen. The Jan. 21 effective date also means approved exchanges could potentially launch Google Ads for Super Bowl-related trading markets.

The prediction markets industry has existed in definitional limbo that shapes everything from banking relationships to state-level legal battles. The core dispute playing out across multiple lawsuits against Kalshi and Robinhood comes down to a single question: Are these financial derivatives or gambling contracts with better branding?

The CFTC says they’re derivatives. Arizona’s Department of Gaming said in its 2025 cease-and-desist letter that there’s “no meaningful difference” between buying a sports outcome contract on Kalshi and placing a bet with a sportsbook. State attorneys general from Nevada to Connecticut have echoed similar arguments.

Google, apparently, sides with the CFTC.

The new policy allows advertising only for CFTC-authorized Designated Contract Markets whose primary business is listing exchange-listed event contracts, plus NFA-registered brokerages providing access to those products. The language is precise: “exchange-listed event contracts” mirrors CFTC terminology for regulated derivatives.

Google’s documentation notes that references to the prediction market rules appear in both the Financial Services and Gambling and Games policy sections. But the operational framework follows the financial services template: federal certification, compliance verification, standardized disclosure requirements. This differs meaningfully from Google’s gambling policies, which require country-by-country and often state-by-state licensing that many operators struggle to obtain.

The timing is significant. Six months ago, this policy would have created a sharp competitive asymmetry. Kalshi held DCM status while Polymarket operated offshore, locked out of the U.S. market after a 2022 CFTC enforcement action.

That is changing fast. Polymarket acquired QCX and QC Clearing, a CFTC-licensed derivatives exchange and clearinghouse, for $112 million, and then secured an Amended Order of Designation from the CFTC on November 25. The approval allows Polymarket to operate as a fully regulated U.S. exchange through intermediated access via futures commission merchants. The Polymarket US platform is still rolling out to waitlisted customers as it has been doing since late 2025. 

Both major prediction market platforms now hold DCM status. It’s reasonable to expect both platforms (and many others) to qualify for Google ads when the policy takes effect. The industry enters 2026 with its two largest players operating under the same federal framework, competing on the same advertising platform, validated by the same categorization.

Also worth noting, the policy update goes into effect two weeks before the biggest sporting event in North America — the 2026 Super Bowl. This also lines up well for DraftKings and FanDuel, both of which have recently launched their own standalone prediction markets platforms. 

Google’s policy draws a clear line. On one side: CFTC-authorized DCMs and NFA-registered brokerages. On the other: everyone else.

That “everyone else” includes offshore prediction markets without U.S. regulatory status, crypto-native platforms that haven’t pursued DCM designation, and notably, state-licensed sportsbooks that might want to market event contracts as prediction markets rather than sports betting.

The policy also explicitly prohibits advertising for “online gambling markets concerning games of chance or lotteries, or activities legally defined as gambling within relevant jurisdictions and not permitted as regulated prediction markets under local law.” The language anticipates attempts to blur the line between regulated derivatives and traditional gambling products.

While the ability to advertise with Google is a huge marketing win in and of itself, the legitimacy that comes from Google categorizing CFTC-regulated prediction markets as financial products, and not gambling, could have even broader implications for prediction markets’ continued mainstream adoption. 

The post Google Officially Categorizes Prediction Markets as Finance, Not Gambling appeared first on DeFi Rate.

131 +