Facebook Payment Lead David Marcus Considered China's Shackling Decision a "Great Development" for Bitcoin

2021-6-21 15:55

Facebook payment leader David Markus viewed China's decision to ban mining as a "great development" opportunity for Bitcoin

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Render Payment (RPM) на Currencies.ru

$ 0 (+0.00%)
Объем 24H $0
Изменеия 24h: 0.00 %, 7d: 0.00 %
Cегодня L: $0 - H: $0
Капитализация $0 Rank 99999
Доступно / Всего 0 RPM

great decision facebook bitcoin china development payment

great decision → Результатов: 39


Now You Can Find Love (or Have Fun) Spending Crypto on Tinder

If you love cryptocurrencies, and you are also a die-hard romantic, today you can merge your two great passions. Now the dating app Tinder accepts crypto payments thanks to Bitrefill. The ad was published a few days ago on Bitrefill’s website, a wise decision considering the proximity of Valentine’s Day… and perhaps the loneliness of […] The post Now You Can Find Love (or Have Fun) Spending Crypto on Tinder appeared first on Ethereum World News.

2019-2-14 22:13


The ‘R’ in iPhone XR doesn’t stand for anything but ‘R’, Apple reveals

We’ve spent weeks scratching our heads over what the ‘R’ in the new iPhone XR stands for. And finally we’ve got a definitive answer to this great mystery: It just means “R. ” Apple’s VP of marketing, Phil Schiller spilled the beans in an interview with Engadget and said that XR and XS are just letters with no special meanings attached to it.

2018-10-23 12:20


Фото:

The SEC Is Delaying Another Bitcoin ETF Decision

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is in no hurry to review the pile of Bitcoin ETF filings it has been accumulating over the past year. Not three weeks since postponing its decision on five other Bitcoin ETFs, the SEC has indicated in a public statement that it will be delaying its decision to approve or reject SolidX Bitcoin Shares until late September.

2018-8-8 17:15


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03