Ethereum 2.0 Tested With 100,000 Stakers

Ethereum 2.0 Tested With 100,000 Stakers
фото показано с : trustnodes.com

2020-2-5 15:27

One of the most advanced ethereum 2. 0 client, Lighthouse, has successfully tested running the network with 100,000 validators according to Danny Ryan, the ethereum 2. 0 coordinator. “Lighthouse runs 100k validators.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Ethereum (ETH) на Currencies.ru

$ 3279.89 (-0.62%)
Объем 24H $24.712b
Изменеия 24h: -1.79 %, 7d: -17.33 %
Cегодня L: $3238.6 - H: $3302.71
Капитализация $395.08b Rank 2
Цена в час новости $ 197.17 (1563.48%)

ethereum validators lighthouse 100 tested danny according

ethereum validators → Результатов: 24


Ethereum Staking Could Become A $160 million Sector Per Vitalik Buterin’s New Proposal

Ethereum Staking Could Very Well Become A $160 million Industry – According To Vitalik's Proposal According to a brand new proposal provided by the creator of Ethereum – Vitalik Buterin – he argues that he is contemplating an increase in rewards for the validators within the network who would serve to provide security on the […]

2019-5-1 23:24


A CBC Casper Tutorial

In order to help more people understand “the other Casper” (Vlad Zamfir’s CBC Casper), and specifically the instantiation that works best for blockchain protocols, I thought that I would write an explainer on it myself, from a less abstract and more “close to concrete usage” point of view.

2018-12-6 04:03


Фото:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03