2019-3-13 00:27 |
Dash Digital Asset Report: March 2019 Update
Since the fall of 2018, Dash has taken some massive steps forward. The project continues to be focused on the payment sector and really delivering on the “currency” promise of the term cryptocurrency.
Despite the tough crypto winter, the ecosystem is expanding, and the sensible budgeting gives confidence that Dash is resilient to short term market swings. Still, the technological development generates the most excitement.
Dash separates itself from its competition through its focus on user experience, and the fact that the Evolution platform is now a tangible milestone is huge for the project.
It is important to note that since the last Dash report Crypto Briefing has amended its methodology and the new grade reflects these changes.
This report is an Update Report – our continuing examination of Dash’s performance and risk/reward factors. The analysis, verdict and accompanying grade reflect our opinion on the long-term value prospects of a given token based on the current state of project development and indicators of future commercial viability – they are not designed to be indicative of short-term trading opportunities.
You can see a full explanation of how our reports are constructed and what they mean at the bottom of this page.
Dash Market OpportunitiesCryptocurrency was one of the first and most popular applications of the blockchain technology, which led into this field becoming very competitive. Furthermore, different projects have specialized into various sectors, each focusing on a particular aspect or a feature. One of the major niches is the reserve asset space, where Bitcoin is the unquestioned leader. It is important to note that with the growth of the Lightning Network and the implementation of RSK, Bitcoin will close the gap with its nimbler rivals in terms of functionality. At the moment, this is not a major threat to Dash. While bitcoin will continue to improve in terms of usability given its status in the industry, capital distribution, and primary use cases, it is likely to remain a reserve asset for the industry much like gold is in the fiat universe.
The launch of Grin and Beam added excitement to the privacy coin space. The established leaders, Monero and Zcash continue to spearhead adoption and at this point Dash can no longer be lumped in with them. From a conversation with CEO Ryan Taylor we gathered that Dash doesn’t internally view itself as a privacy coin. The project aims to offer better privacy than Bitcoin, but is not going to chase the specialized coins. Dash is not looking at privacy by default, and with the extremely low amount transactions using the PrivateSend feature, that market segment appears to be out of reach for Dash.
The remittance space is also becoming increasingly competitive with the likes of Stellar and Ripple offering products and features that often surpass Dash in terms of cost and speed. The SendFriend project is a perfect example of XRP being used for instant cross border transaction that significantly reduce costs and waiting periods for users. Such applications should be a real concern for Dash. The project’s calling card has been its UX/UI, but the release of 3rd party applications that leverage coins such as XRP or XLM reduces this advantage. Dash is less competitive than PoS and BFT-family projects when it comes to speed (this is mitigated by InstantSend) and cost, so the UX/UI advantage is critical for the cryptocurrency.
In this context, merchant and consumer adoption becomes even more important. Dash continues to expand its efforts in Latin America with the hope of establishing regional dominance. It is also growing its presence in niche markets like the cannabis space.
For Dash, 2019 will be a pivotal year. If the Evolution launch is successful and it catalyzes application development around the Dash ecosystem, the project will solidify itself as a dominant cryptocurrency, and spur cryptocurrency adoption as a whole.However, if progress towards Evolution stalls, or Dash sees its adoption efforts falter, it will quickly find that its more specialized competitors have eaten away its market share.
Part One: The Technology Case Underlying TechnologyDash kicked off the year with the massive 0.13 update. The release included several key improvements such as making most transactions InstantSend by default, deterministic Masternode lists and lower mixing denominations and higher number of mixing rounds for PrivateSend. The technological improvements have been designed to make Dash cheaper and easier to use. Furthermore, the iOS and Android wallets were also upgraded. No less important is the fact that the update contains nearly half of the code needed for the much-anticipated Evolution. The update roll-out has been somewhat delayed because of the intricacies of activating Spork 15, which would reset treasury votes. However, it is encouraging to see that the development team was able to release update 0.13.1 in order to mitigate any delays to the overall roadmap.
On deck is update 0.14, with ChainLocks and Long Living Masternode Quorums. While ChainLinks have been mostly been talked about in the context of security against the 51% attack and selfish mining, the update will also make it so merchants will no longer need to wait for six confirmations for a transactions. The recent attack on ETC has once brought security to the forefront of conversations in the industry and it is important that Dash is being proactive about this. The update is expected in the first half of 2019 and will clear the way for Evolution.
Dash Core 1.0 is also expected in 2019, with DashPay being the first application launched. If Dash delivers on these targets, they could generate a lot of positive momentum not just for the project, but the industry as a whole. Dash wants to create simple and easy to use applications that don’t require the user to be a blockchain expert. If successful, this would break the entrance barrier that has been, so far, hindering mass adoption.
Part Two: The Business Case Ecosystem DevelopmentDash remains one of the few projects in the blockchain industry with a clear focus on adoption. It is encouraging to see the team find success with some of the strategies and focus on expanding early gains. Venezuela has become a real success story for Dash amidst the political turmoil and social unrest that has shaken the country.
Still, Dash Core Group estimates merchant adoption to be less than 2% in Venezuela and is targeting 15% as a signal of everyday usage of the cryptocurrency.Venezuela has been a unique testing ground for Dash, and the locally driven adoption efforts have created an organic expansion path for the cryptocurrency. People leaving the country due to difficult conditions expand Dash’s footprint across Latin America. This has become especially evident in Columbia. Dash is also angling towards Argentina as a potential area of expansion.
Outside of Latin America, Dash has slowly started to make headway on the African continent. While Dash Core Group is being very careful not to overreach given the challenging conditions of the crypto market, some progress can still be seen in Nigeria and Zimbabwe, for example.
Regions with developing economies and challenging financial climates make for a natural beachhead for blockchain fintech projects. However, Dash appears to separate itself from the rest through a focus on on-the-ground adoption.
The global ATM map has also expanded, as has the number of Dash integrations and partnerships. The number of merchants accepting Dash, has now crossed 4900.
Key to Dash’s development are businesses like Alt Thirty Six. The company catering to the legal cannabis industry was mentioned in the previous report, but their B2B and B2C offerings have been growing in adoption since. This is a real western market use case, where Dash is used to offer tangible solutions to payments and cash management problems.
Similarly, the project needs to continue its efforts to incentivize and strengthen its community. The growing number of solutions for fractional ownership of Dash Masternodes is encouraging. Given the costly staking requirement of 1,000 Dash and the comparatively low returns, partial ownership is important for decentralization efforts and overall health of the network.
The crypto industry is still young and nobody has been able to establish a meaningful lead, given the overall nascent level of adoption of the technology. Dash needs to find success stories and traction in order to continue building momentum.
Lead TeamLast summer Bob Carroll was hired by Dash Core Group as the CTO and over the last 3 quarters he has been able to rework and improve the operations of the Dash technical teams. His experience with working on large scale projects with big teams has helped the project gain structure and start delivering on schedule.
The technical staff has become more efficient and Bob Carroll is continuing to make improvements. The team has undergone agile training and the release of update 0.13 and the expectations of a quick follow-up for 0.14 are encouraging.
Also, the proposal to demote Ryan Taylor resoundingly failed. While the proposal was akin to a vote of no-confidence, the fact that it found little support, suggests that Dash Core Group leadership has the support of the community.This is important, since Dash Core Group has been working to rectify past shortcomings, and with the difficult market conditions it is important to avoid major strife within the community.
RoadmapThe updated roadmap is very product focused and reflects the community’s desire to see Evolution. While there are now dates present, there is an expectation for update 0.14 to come in the first half of 2019, and for Evolution to be launched in the second half of this year.
The absence of concrete release dates is troubling given a history of misaligned expectations. However, the fact that update 0.13 has already been released is an encouraging sign.
There are also regular product updates that are published on the blog, which helps in regards to transparency and managing community expectations.
Part Three: The Investment Case Token PerformanceLike most of the market, Dash had a tough time at the end of 2018. The price tumbled, but has since stabilized and has started a limited recovery.
Since the treasury is denominated in Dash, prolonged downward price swings are dangerous for the project. However, given the new lean approach, a positive move in price could be a nice bonus for the project and its community.
Dash / USD Short-term price analysisIn the short term, Dash retain a bullish outlook, with the cryptocurrency tentatively trading above its 200-period moving average on the four-hour time frame. Despite a strong rally higher in February, bearish signs are starting to emerge across the four-hour time frame, with a large head and shoulders pattern currently looming over the DASH / USD pair. If bulls fail to rally the cryptocurrency above its former monthly trading higher and negate the bearish pattern, the DASH / USD pair could easily reverse all of February’s hard-earned gains.
DASH / USD H4 Chart (Source: TradingView)
Pattern Watch
Traders should closely monitor the head and shoulder pattern on the four-hour time frame, a sustained break of neckline could see the DASH / USD eroding all its former monthly gains.
MACD
The MACD indicator on the four-hour time frames is starting come under slight downward pressure, although no clear sell sign has been generated.
RSI
The RSI indicator also appears weak on the four-hour time frame and suggests that selling pressures are building.
Dash / USD Medium-term price analysisDash remains bearish over the medium-term, with the cryptocurrency still trading at historically depressed levels and also failing to move above its trend defining 200-day moving average. The daily time frame shows that DASH / USD pair has been trapped within an ascending triangle pattern since December last year; ascending triangle patterns are usually bullish and can sometimes signal the end of a downtrend. Traders should note, once a definitive breakout has occurred, the upside price projection of the pattern is found by measuring the widest distance of the pattern and applying it to the resistance breakout.
DASH / USD Daily Chart (Source: TradingView)
Pattern Watch
If buyers can rally the cryptocurrency towards the December 2018 trading high, we will start to see a bullish inverse head and shoulders pattern forming.
MACD
The MACD indicator on the daily time frame is currently flatlined and is failing to generate any clear trading signals.
RSI
The MACD indicator on the daily time frame is currently flatlined and is failing to generate any clear trading signals.
Dash / USD Long-term price analysisDash also has a bearish long-term outlook, with the cryptocurrency still trading at historically low levels and well below its key 52-week moving average. The weekly time frame shows that the DASH / USD pair is currently confined to sideways trading action, despite moving out of a large falling wedge pattern. Technical indicators on the weekly time frame suggest that buying momentum remains weak, although a strong bullish signal is being generated from the MACD indicator.
DASH / USD Weekly Chart (Source: TradingView)
Traders should closely monitor the falling wedge pattern on the weekly time frame as these types of patterns typically signal major technical reversals. However, the Momentum indicator is currently flatlined on the weekly time frame, highlighting that long-term buying interest remains weak. On the other hand, the MACD indicator is currently bullish on the mentioned time frame, with both the MACD line and MACD histogram generating strong buy signals.
Dash March 2019 Update Report: BMarket Opportunity7Ecosystem Structure8.5Token Economy7.8Token Performance5Core Team7.2Underlying Technology8Roadmap Progress7.5 7.4Final Grade And VerdictDespite the difficulties of the bear market, Dash remains one of the strongest cryptocurrency projects in the industry. Its loyal community, coherent adoption strategy and major looming catalyst, make it one of the breakout candidates for 2019.However, if Dash stumbles with any of its planned releases, especially that of Evolution, the consequences will be most dire. Given the dependency of the funding on the price of Dash, missteps could be disastrous.
Considering the risks and rewards, Dash receives a B grade. It is important to note that under the new framework the original Dash report would have been graded as a B-, so while the current grade of a B is, technically, a reaffirmation, it should actually be considered an upgrade.
We consider a B grade to mean that a major progress indicator (tech development or ecosystem growth) is typically advancing well in accordance with roadmap but the other is lagging; upcoming catalysts signal potential for positive price trend. Project remains highly susceptible to adverse market conditions; token price is moderately volatile.Additional InformationDash Website Digital Asset Evaluation & Report (DARE) Methodology Introduction To The Framework
The Digital Asset Report and Evaluation (DARE) is a standardized, dynamic approach to evaluating blockchain-based projects and identifying value in the associated crypto-assets.
The report is the result of an exhaustive research and analysis process based on seven fundamental factors. Based on a weighted grading of these seven project fundamentals, a verdict and letter grade conclude each report, which is followed up with periodic updates, released over a quarterly basis.
The analysis, verdict and accompanying grade reflect our opinion on the long-term value prospects of a given token based on the current state of project development and indicators of future commercial viability.
The state of product development and indicators of commercial viability derive from an analysis of seven principle project fundamentals – market opportunity, ecosystem structure, token economics, core team, underlying technology, and roadmap progress.
The underlying methodology involves both quantitative and qualitative analysis to ensure that we produce the most accurate picture possible at the time we conduct our evaluation.
As a publication focused on assessing the long-term value and associated risks of a token project, we do not encourage the use of DARE as a short-term buy/sell indicator and this report does not represent financial advice.
The Initiation Report
Our first look at a token or cryptocurrency employs the Initiation report as a vehicle for delivery. Initiation reports provide readers a comprehensive analysis of the project fundamentals and draws hard conclusions from our assessment.
The details of the Initiation report include a project summary, project introduction, presentation and analysis of seven key project fundamentals, concluding with a grade and final verdict derived from our weighted evaluation system.
The Update Report
Each initiated token or cryptocurrency will undergo a sequential reevaluation, with Update reports presenting the latest, most relevant analysis on a quarterly basis. The content contained in the update report is confined to analysis of changes in project fundamentals that influence the long-term value prospects of the token or cryptocurrency.
Updated project grades and verdicts are provided based on a reassessment of the seven factors underlying our methodology.
Grades assigned to tokens or cryptocurrencies in Update reports can reflect a change in our opinion of the project or provide a reaffirmation of the Initiation report.
Methodology
We consider the project-asset paradigm from seven key angles: market opportunity, ecosystem structure, token economics, core team, underlying technology, and roadmap progress.
The evaluation examines the current state of the project, how it relates to the initially stated goals, and provides an analysis of each fundamental to approximate an accurate outlook for the future.
These factors are all, in some way, codependent, so they are analyzed both individually and in the context of the overall scope and progress of the project. The evaluation process utilizes a proprietary scoring system comprised of weighted variables based on the follow project fundamentals.
Market OpportunityMarket Opportunity
It is important to examine the market opportunity of each blockchain project to determine the prospects for future growth. The market opportunity(s) of a given project are assessed according to the addressable target market size and competitive advantages, if any, held by the project.
The addressable market size is a reflection of the potential number of consumers and valuation of the target industry of the project.
The competitive advantage(s) of the project and closest contenders both within and outside the blockchain space are weighted heavily in the analysis of the market opportunity.
addressable target market size attractiveness of product existence of industry leaders moats or windows in market competitive advantage of project Ecosystem DevelopmentEcosystem Development
Blockchain projects are highly dependent on network effects. It does not matter if the project is very innovative, if its acceptance in the community and the market is low. This is especially important for network projects that are being built for future dApp development and rely on exponential ecosystem growth for success.
We take a comparative look at variables such as number of active addresses, on chain transactions and number of community supporters to determine the health and potential of the ecosystem.
The number of existing dApps and quality of partnerships are other variables taken into consideration to assess this fundamental.
Of great importance to any ecosystem is the level of decentralization – to establish this, we ascertain the spread of assets, structure of governance and role of validators in the network.
An ideal project will have proven partnerships and active dApps on its network, and a strong community of supporters and developers to foster expansion. The network architecture should also be in line with the target level of decentralization. In its entirety, the evaluation incorporates, but is not limited to:
network analysis (dApps) comparative size and quality of community support social media asset allocation and on-chain data analysis governance Token EconomicsExamination of the token economics begins with a comparative analysis of the project market cap with respect to its relative position to other projects. Analysis also includes evaluating the role of the token, potential drivers of demand, and other factors that may lead to appreciation in value over time.
Token Economics
Assessment of the token economics primarily incorporates variables such as:
market cap of project role of token and demand potential drivers of value relevant news incentive mechanisms Token PerformanceToken Performance
Here we consider price volatility risks associated with underlying asset. Token performance is weighted slightly lower than the other fundamentals because of the more transient and dynamic nature of price movement, volume and liquidity.
We look at the price and volume performance trends of the tokens in the context of the overall market, as well as, individual project dynamics. It is important to note that while volatility reflects risk, it is not necessarily an accurate indicator of the commercial viability of the project or long term value of the token.
The ideal project will have an asset with positive long, medium and short-term price momentum, in addition to strong, steady volume on major exchanges with a low level of vulnerability to price swings. The evaluation incorporates, but is not limited to:
trading data analysis relevant news social media token economics value modeling Core TeamCore Team
The core team takes into consideration the influence of the leaders and central developers on the prospects of a given project.
Team competency and capability are assessed according to an analysis of their credentials and the espoused ambitions of the project. In addition to credentials that are backed up by strong evidence from a demonstrable track record of prior successes in previous business and engineering pursuits, the size and balance of the team are also assessed in relation to the goals and scope of the project.
Moreover, the overall stability and sustained growth of the team are used as indicators of project viability.
Variables which are factored into the core team score include, but are not limited to:
team credentials changes to lead personnel size and balance of team evidence of instability team growth Underlying TechnologyUnderlying Technology
Technological development is a central aspect any blockchain-based project. Here we assess the functionality of technology and quality in comparison to competing projects.
The ideal project will have relevant technological solutions, be keeping on track with the stated milestone schedule and be producing quality code. The evaluation incorporates, but is not limited to:
network components (i.e. structure, consensus, throughput) GitHub activity pace of development relevancy of tech Roadmap ProgressRoadmap Progress
The espoused goals laid out by the team, the initial plan and updated iterations of the roadmap, represent crucial indicators of the ability of the team to deliver on promises in addition to providing a critical metric of commitment to the project.
Timely delivery on milestones is assessed, in addition to upcoming catalysts or windows of opportunity that could prove crucial to the long-term project prospects. Accountability of the team is also taken into consideration through an evaluation of the team’s communications with the community, and is given additional weight when evidence is available to corroborate claims.
roadmap evaluation upcoming catalysts team communications progress announcements upcoming milestones of competition DisclaimerCrypto Briefing provides general information about cryptocurrency news, crowdfunded tech startups, and blockchain technology. The information on this website (including any websites or files that may be linked or otherwise accessed through this website) is provided solely as general information to the public. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice.
Decentral Media Inc., the publisher of Crypto Briefing, is not an investment advisor and does not offer or provide investment advice or other financial advice. Accordingly, nothing on this website constitutes, or should be relied on as, investment advice or financial advice of any kind. Specifically, none of the information on this website constitutes, or should be relied on as, a suggestion, offer, or other solicitation to engage in, or refrain from engaging in, any purchase, sale, or any other any investment-related activity with respect to any ICO, STO, digital asset, or other transaction. Note that the authors of this report may be invested in digital assets that are mentioned here.
The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. expressly disclaims any and all responsibility from any loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from reliance on any information on or accessed through this website, any error, omission, or inaccuracy in any such information, or any action or inaction resulting therefrom.
Cryptocurrencies and blockchain are emerging technologies that carry inherent risks of high volatility, and investing in them can be highly speculative and offer few – if any – guarantees. You should never make an investment decision on any investment based solely on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional of your choosing if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO or other investment.
See full terms and conditions for more.
The post Dash Digital Asset Update Report: March 2019 appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024