Reviewing Code Is Mind-Numbing: Q&A With Bitcoin Maintainer Andrew Chow

2023-3-11 18:35

He stumbled upon Bitcoin in high school while looking for ways to pay for his favorite video games. He now reviews and improves Bitcoin’s code for a living. Sometimes it's boring, mind-numbing, but he does it anyway. Somebody has to.

Similar to Notcoin - TapSwap on Solana Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Bitcoin (BTC) íà Currencies.ru

$ 65756.11 (+1.00%)
Îáúåì 24H $34.51b
Èçìåíåèÿ 24h: 7.12 %, 7d: 5.21 %
Cåãîäíÿ L: $61392.69 - H: $65792.05
Êàïèòàëèçàöèÿ $1295.309b Rank 1
Öåíà â ÷àñ íîâîñòè $ 20314.09 (223.7%)

bitcoin code mind-numbing improves reviews video games

bitcoin code → Ðåçóëüòàòîâ: 126


Ôîòî:

Bitcoin [BTC] Developer Discovers Vulnerability In Bitcoin Cash [BCH] Code, Finds It Near Impossible to Report the Bug to Developers

On Thursday, August 9, a developer and researcher in the crypto industry detailed the difficulties he had communicating a vulnerability in the Bitcoin Cash protocol to their dev team. Cory Fields from the Digital Currency Initiative at MIT Media Lab in Massachusetts outlined the issue in a post on his Medium blog.

2018-8-10 12:02


Bitcoin Network Hashrate Hits Record-Breaking “52 Quintillion” Hashes Per Second

Bitcoin Hashrate Sits at a Record-Breaking 52 Quintillion, Restoring Investors’ Confidence The Blockchain, previously known as Blockchain.info, has recently revealed that bitcoin’s hashrate, the speed at which an operation is completed in bitcoin code, has reached an all-time high of 52 quintillion, which is equivalent to 52,000,000,000,000,000,000. Bitcoinist also reported the news, adding that a […]

2018-8-7 00:54


What Is Masari?

All major cryptocurrencies have seen their code being forked over the past few years. It is a trend affecting Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and so forth. Monero has seen its fair share of forks too, although the Masari project has been overlooked by a lot of people. Nearly a year after being first announced, now is […]

2018-8-5 02:00


Ôîòî:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03