Kraken slams Australia’s regulatory uncertainty following court ruling on fiat margin trading

Kraken slams Australia’s regulatory uncertainty following court ruling on fiat margin trading
ôîòî ïîêàçàíî ñ : invezz.com

2024-9-10 17:17

Kraken, one of the leading cryptocurrency exchanges, has raised concerns about the lack of regulatory clarity in Australia following a Federal Court ruling against its fiat margin trading product.

The ruling, which sided with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), underscores the need for tailored regulation in the country’s rapidly growing crypto sector.

In a recent blog post, Kraken emphasized that the decision highlights a broader issue plaguing Australia’s cryptocurrency landscape: regulatory ambiguity.

“This ruling makes it clearer than ever that bespoke crypto regulation is urgently needed,” the exchange stated.

ASIC’s legal battle with Kraken

The legal battle between ASIC and Kraken dates back to last year, when ASIC filed civil proceedings against Bit Trade, a subsidiary of Kraken’s parent company, Payward Incorporated.

ASIC accused Bit Trade of failing to meet legal requirements under the Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) of the Corporations Act.

Specifically, ASIC argued that Kraken’s fiat margin trading product, which allowed users to access up to five times the value of their assets in credit, violated regulations by functioning as a credit facility without proper authorization.

In late August, the Federal Court ruled against Bit Trade, confirming that the platform breached section s994B(2) of the Corporations Act.

This ruling applies only to Kraken’s fiat margin trading services, which are now restricted to wholesale clients.

The exchange’s cryptocurrency margin trading services, however, remain unaffected.

ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court praised the ruling, stating,

Consumers should receive the full protection of the law when dealing with crypto-asset products. It is a legal requirement for financial products to be distributed appropriately.

Australia’s regulatory challenges for crypto industry

While Kraken expressed disappointment in the ruling, the exchange also stressed the broader implications for Australia’s crypto industry.

The lack of clear regulation has left businesses and investors operating in a confusing and unstable environment.

According to Kraken, the Federal Court’s decision serves as a wake-up call for lawmakers to prioritize the development of a clear regulatory framework for cryptocurrency.

Australia has made strides toward regulating the crypto market, including a draft approach that the industry largely supports.

However, delays in legislation could push the implementation of these regulations beyond the end of the year, risking the country’s ability to fully capitalize on the economic opportunities presented by crypto innovation.

Globally, many countries have already enacted tailored regulations to manage crypto assets, providing clear guidelines for businesses and consumers.

Kraken noted that without similar measures, Australia risks falling behind in the global race to regulate this emerging technology.

What’s next for Kraken?

Despite the setback, Kraken remains committed to complying with legal and regulatory requirements in all jurisdictions where it operates.

Following the ruling, the company swiftly made adjustments to ensure its margin trading services meet regulatory standards in Australia.

Kraken is also working on additional pathways to make fiat margin extensions available to more clients in the future.

Looking ahead, Kraken and other crypto industry players are urging the Australian government to fast-track the development of clear, comprehensive crypto regulations to foster innovation while ensuring consumer protection.

The exchange believes that with the right regulatory framework, Australia can position itself as a leader in the global crypto market.

Australia’s growing crypto market

Despite the regulatory challenges, Australia’s cryptocurrency market continues to grow, with a crypto ownership rate of 17%, higher than the global average of 15%.

However, the increasing scrutiny on the industry, highlighted by recent actions against major exchanges like Binance, indicates that more regulation is on the horizon.

As the country grapples with how best to regulate this evolving industry, the demand for clear, proportionate laws is becoming increasingly urgent.

Both businesses and consumers are eager for a framework that will provide stability, foster innovation, and ensure the safe use of digital assets.

The post Kraken slams Australia’s regulatory uncertainty following court ruling on fiat margin trading appeared first on Invezz

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Kraken (KRAK) íà Currencies.ru

$ 0 (+0.00%)
Îáúåì 24H $0
Èçìåíåèÿ 24h: 0.00 %, 7d: 0.00 %
Cåãîäíÿ L: $0 - H: $0
Êàïèòàëèçàöèÿ $0 Rank 99999
Äîñòóïíî / Âñåãî 0 KRAK

ruling regulatory kraken fiat trading following australia

ruling regulatory → Ðåçóëüòàòîâ: 45


Ôîòî:

XRP Lawsuit: Judge Accused SEC of Hypocrisy, Orders Release of Hinman’s Documents

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s case against Ripple Labs lingers, and the most recent of events has seen the U.S. regulatory body hit hard by an unfavorable ruling. A judge presiding over the suit has repudiated the SEC’s attorney-client protection claim as a reason not to release documents pertaining to the Hinman speech. Judge Netburn […]

2022-7-22 23:48


Ôîòî:

Regulatory Roundup: French Court Considers Bitcoin Money, Cryptocurrencies Legitimized in South Korea, Australia, India

The cryptocurrency sector worldwide saw several historic regulatory events last week. In this roundup, we cover a landmark bitcoin ruling by a French court, South Korea’s first crypto bill, an Australian court’s ruling, Germany’s announcement, and a recent FATF meeting where more than 800 delegates discussed crypto regulations.

2020-3-10 05:00


Ôîòî:

Why Are Governments Desperate To Regulate Cryptocurrencies?

There are a couple of reasons why the ruling party and lawmakers of a specific country would want to bring cryptocurrencies under their regulatory framework. Most of these reasons are connected to creating an additional source of income for the government, but they are usually masked under the “its too dangerous for the investors” excuse.

2019-3-22 11:16