BitMEX Research, the research division of a prominent crypto derivatives exchange, BitMEX, has issued its official Q2 2026 Derivatives Report. The report highlights that the market structure is shaping the differences across diverse perpetual futures markets instead of trader sentiment.

BitMEX Research’s report detects collateral design, oracle construction, and exchange demographics as the key factors impacting consistent funding disparities. Particularly, such structural differences provide recurring opportunities to let traders capitalize on diverse funding spreads.

BitMEX Research’s Q2 2026 Derivatives Report has pointed out the structural drivers leading to the gaps in the rates within the perpetual futures funding landscape. The report also reveals the impact of these dynamics on tokenized commodity and cryptocurrency perpetuals. Funding rates denote the periodic payments that are exchanged between short and long traders to maintain the alignment between perpetual futures prices and the core asset.

Though structural characteristics normally underscore indicators of bearish or bullish market sentiment, they often play a significantly bigger role in outlining their behavior. Examining such factors can deliver more dependable insights in comparison with depending just on market sentiment. One of the top findings of the report deals with margin currency. The report drew a comparison between $BTC-margined XBTUSD perpetual contract and $USDT-margined $XBTUSDT contract for a period of 3.5 years.

Irrespective of tracking the same asset, these 2 contracts witnessed an average yearly funding spread of almost 3.93%. Specifically, the spread remained negative during up to 94% of the ninety-day phases. The report associates the respective difference with exclusive trader behavior. In this respect, $BTC-collateralized traders usually tend to hedge, whereas stablecoin consumers are more inclined to focus on leveraged long positions.

According to BitMEX Research’s report, from 2023 to 2026, the $BTC perpetual contracts of Hyperliquid traded at 7.17% in terms of an average yearly funding premium in comparison with Binance. Simultaneously, Ether perpetuals recorded an average premium of approximately 5.31%. In line with the report, decentralized exchanges gain a more long-biased and retail-driven trading community.

On the other hand, centralized exchanges leverage more effective arbitrage and more institutional participation. Overall, the report signifies that making a distinction between provisional event-led dislocations and long-term systematic funding differences can assist traders in better examining opportunities existing in the world of perpetual futures.

Bitcoin price in Telegram @btc_price_every_hour

104 +